From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:19:15 -0600 From: Grant Grundler To: James Bottomley Cc: PARISC list Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [parisc-linux-cvs] linux carlos Message-ID: <20030825191915.GA377@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <3F2E2C7700004E38@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <20030825164553.GB28778@dsl2.external.hp.com> <1061830247.2044.165.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1061830247.2044.165.camel@mulgrave> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:50:45AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > Not for 2.6 we shouldn't. My intent was not to commit the code, but just get debugging working. > The beginnings of the hotplug CPU API made > logical CPU numbers deprecated (even for x86, which was the worst > logical vs phsyical number abuser). We need to move entirely to > physical numbers only for 2.6 That's not technically possible. PARISC firmware uses the HPA to reference specific devices (including CPU). We can use the same CPU number as PAT PDC and call them "physical". But systems which don't have PAT PDC can only use arbitrary numbers assigned by the parisc-linux startup code. Maybe there is a way to make the numbers match PIM info output but I'm not sure how. hth, grant