All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: insecure <insecure@mail.od.ua>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] raceless request_region() fix (was Re: Linux 2.6.0-test4)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 08:20:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308260820.13205.insecure@mail.od.ua> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F4A86B8.9080404@pobox.com>

[de-cc'ing Linus]

On Tuesday 26 August 2003 00:59, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Is it a race if noone cares?  :)
>
> The code does
>
> 	if (!request_region(...))
> 		fail
> 	touch hardware
> 	release_region
> 	if (!request_region(...))
> 		fail
>
> If the HIGHLY UNLIKELY event of another ISA driver claiming this region
> occurs, the system continues working just fine.

Yes, this particular driver is fine. My patch just eliminate back-to-back
 	release_region(...)
 	if (!request_region(...)) fail;
pair.

I just have a feeling that if I am going to replace check_region with
request_region, I can close race window altogether.

BTW, it all started when I tried to get rid of check_region in de4x5.c.
That's a bit worse. For example:
        barrier();
        request_region(iobase, (lp->bus == PCI ? DE4X5_PCI_TOTAL_SIZE :
                                DE4X5_EISA_TOTAL_SIZE),
                       lp->adapter_name);
        lp->rxRingSize = NUM_RX_DESC;
-- 
vda

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-23  0:48 Linux 2.6.0-test4 Linus Torvalds
2003-08-23  1:21 ` [PATCH] Fix cdrom error handling in 2.6 Erik Andersen
2003-08-23 12:26 ` Linux 2.6.0-test4 vlad
2003-08-23 15:31   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-23 15:33     ` William Scott Lockwood III
2003-08-25  5:43     ` vlad
2003-08-24 11:39 ` [PATCH] airo (was: Re: Linux 2.6.0-test4) Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-24 21:00   ` Javier Achirica
2003-08-24 11:47 ` [PATCH] vmlinux-*.lds " Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-24 11:51 ` [PATCH] macide " Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-24 12:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-08-24 12:29     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-08-25 21:00 ` [patch] 2.6.0-test4: sis190 doesn't compile with gcc 2.95 Adrian Bunk
2003-08-26 17:44   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-25 21:20 ` Linux 2.6.0-test4 insecure
2003-08-25 21:26   ` [PATCH] raceless request_region() fix (was Re: Linux 2.6.0-test4) insecure
2003-08-25 21:59     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-26  5:20       ` insecure [this message]
2003-08-25 22:56 ` Linux 2.6.0-test4 (compile statistics) John Cherry
2003-08-30  9:04 ` Linux 2.6.0-test4 Ralf Hildebrandt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200308260820.13205.insecure@mail.od.ua \
    --to=insecure@mail.od.ua \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.