From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" <filia@softhome.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Takao Indoh <indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: cache limit
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:46:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030826174646.GF16831@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F4B3352.4000703@softhome.net>
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:15:46PM +0200, Ihar 'Philips' Filipau wrote:
> If I have 1GB of memory and my applications for use only 16MB - it
> doesn't mean I want to fill 1GB-16MB with garbage like file my momy had
> viewed two weeks ago.
>
> That's it: OS should scale for *application* *needs*.
>
> Can you compare in your mind overhead of managing 1GB of cache with
> managing e.g. 16MB of cache?
>
Ok, let's benchmark it.
Yes, I can see the logic in your argument, but at this point, numbers are
needed to see if or how much of a win this might be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-26 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <n7lV.2HA.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ofAJ.4dx.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <ogZM.5KJ.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oyDw.5FP.33@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-26 10:15 ` cache limit Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-26 17:46 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-08-27 16:03 Joseph Malicki
[not found] <000801c36cb1$454d4950$1001a8c0@etofmv650>
2003-08-27 16:02 ` YoshiyaETO
[not found] <oJ5P.699.21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.23@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oJ5P.699.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <oQh2.4bQ.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-26 19:08 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-26 19:23 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-27 10:21 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-27 11:07 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] <m6Bv.3ys.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <mLY8.dO.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-21 9:52 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-25 7:17 ` Takao Indoh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-19 4:39 Anthony R.
2003-08-19 4:57 ` Nuno Silva
2003-08-19 5:33 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-08-19 6:20 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 9:05 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-19 9:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 9:28 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-08-19 9:43 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 13:32 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-19 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2003-08-19 14:28 ` Anthony R.
2003-08-19 18:26 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-19 5:42 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-21 0:49 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-21 23:47 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-25 2:45 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-25 4:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-25 22:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-26 9:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-27 9:36 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-27 9:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-27 11:14 ` Takao Indoh
2003-08-27 11:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-02 10:52 ` Takao Indoh
2003-09-02 11:30 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-02 17:21 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-27 16:01 ` Joseph Malicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030826174646.GF16831@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=filia@softhome.net \
--cc=indou.takao@soft.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.