From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Reis Subject: Re: Killing lockd Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:30:16 -0300 Sender: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20030828193016.GA1513@async.com.br> References: <20030828182808.GC1166@async.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: NFS@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: To: Trond Myklebust In-Reply-To: Errors-To: nfs-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Discussion of NFS under Linux development, interoperability, and testing. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:58:23PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > >>>>> " " == Christian Reis writes: > > > Is there a way to kill lockd, or to tell it to restart and > > register again in the portmapper? I do know that something (or > > maybe it's suicide) tries to wait for lockd to die upon > > shutting down on our diskless network, without success. Any > > hints? > > Why can't you use pmap_dump + pmap_set? The above type of recovery > situation is exactly what they have been developed for. > > Alternatively, you would have to umount all the partitions that are > running without 'nolock' set. Hmmm. This isn't on a client, though, it's on a server - it doesn't mount any foreign exports. Or did you literally mean partitions? Now, pmap_dump/_set would have helped *if* I had known about them previously to killing the portmapper Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs