From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [FS Benchmark] reiser4 vs. reiserfs (3.6)
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 17:46:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030831004608.GA30238@pegasys.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F50A5A2.8070107@cyberone.com.au>
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 11:24:50PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> Gabor MICSKO wrote:
>
> >Kernel: 2.6.0-test4 SMP
> >
> >
> Hi Gabor,
> Just a suggestion, comparisons like this are often nicer to read if they
> are in a patch format. It also saves you having to do anything by hand.
Side by side is even better ala diff -y or comm.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw@pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-31 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-30 8:45 [FS Benchmark] reiser4 vs. reiserfs (3.6) Gabor MICSKO
2003-08-30 13:24 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-31 0:46 ` jw schultz [this message]
2003-08-30 17:08 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030831004608.GA30238@pegasys.ws \
--to=jw@pegasys.ws \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.