From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 13:58:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030901205834.GC31760@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309011627.28052.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:27:28PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> contest benchmarks.
>
> no_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 79 93.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 80 93.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
Regressions:
> cacherun:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 1 75 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.94
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 1 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 1 77 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96
> process_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 108 69.4 64.0 28.7 1.35
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 125 59.2 92.5 38.4 1.58
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 131 56.5 104.5 41.2 1.64
> io_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 4 119 64.7 43.4 19.2 1.49
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 4 110 70.0 35.4 16.4 1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 129 59.7 43.1 16.9 1.61
Improvements:
> ctar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 3 117 67.5 1.0 5.1 1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 115 69.6 1.0 6.1 1.46
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 99 80.8 0.0 0.0 1.24
> xtar_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 3 132 58.3 3.0 7.5 1.65
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 141 54.6 3.3 7.0 1.78
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 3 109 70.6 1.0 3.7 1.36
> io_other:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 116 67.2 48.0 21.4 1.45
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 110 70.0 41.0 18.8 1.39
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 111 69.4 40.8 18.8 1.39
> read_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 109 72.5 8.6 5.5 1.36
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 106 73.6 8.3 5.6 1.34
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 100 78.0 6.5 5.0 1.25
> list_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 97 79.4 0.0 8.2 1.21
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 96 80.2 0.0 7.3 1.22
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 95 80.0 0.0 7.4 1.19
> mem_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 2 101 78.2 67.0 3.0 1.26
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 2 98 79.6 66.5 3.1 1.24
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 2 93 84.9 65.0 3.2 1.16
> dbench_load:
> Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
> 2.6.0-test4 4 390 19.5 6.2 57.3 4.88
> 2.6.0-test4-mm2 3 242 31.8 3.0 44.2 3.06
> 2.6.0-test4-mm4 4 260 29.6 3.2 45.0 3.25
Except that mm2 is doing better with dbench...
What changed there?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-01 6:27 [BENCHMARK] 2.6.0-test4-mm4 with contest Con Kolivas
2003-09-01 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030901205834.GC31760@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.