From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] mtime&ctime updated when it should not
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:48:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030901224829.GG31760@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901183527.GB21251@DUK2.13thfloor.at>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 08:35:27PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 08:11:13PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > one user pointed my attention to the fact that when the write fails
> > (for example when the user quota is exceeded) the modification time is
> > still updated (the problem appears both in 2.4 and 2.6). According to
> > SUSv3 that should not happen because the specification says that mtime
> > and ctime should be marked for update upon a successful completition
> > of a write (not that it would forbid updating the times in other cases
> > but I find it at least a bit nonintuitive).
> > The easiest fix would be probably to "backup" the times at the
> > beginning of the write and restore the original values when the write
> > fails (simply not updating the times would require more surgery because
> > for example vmtruncate() is called when the write fails and it also
> > updates the times).
> > So should I write the patch or is the current behaviour considered
> > correct?
>
> hmm, what if the request only partially succeeds?
>
> for example echo "five" >/tmp/x will create /tmp/x
> if inode limit permits it, but will leave it empty
> if the space limit does not ...
>
> personally I wouldn't care about the modification
> time on such a quota fault ...
At least you would know when the truncate happened, even if the write didn't
complete successfully.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-01 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-01 18:11 [BUG] mtime&ctime updated when it should not Jan Kara
2003-09-01 18:35 ` Herbert Poetzl
2003-09-01 19:05 ` Jan Kara
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-09-01 19:18 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-01 19:31 ` Jan Kara
2003-09-01 19:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-02 13:06 ` Jan Kara
2003-09-06 8:05 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030901224829.GG31760@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.