From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be>
Cc: shemminger@osdl.org, schulz@schwaar.com, scott.feldman@intel.com,
jgarzik@pobox.com, bridge@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Bridge] Re: [more info] Re: [2.4.22] bad interaction between e100 and bridge: BUG at dev.c:991!
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:17:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902111729.1791f2ad.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309022023.16397.bdschuym@pandora.be>
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:23:16 +0200
Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@pandora.be> wrote:
> A pristine 2.4.22 doesn't have bridge-netfilter.
This is true.
> I don't see how bridge-netfilter would be involved anyway, altering
> a packet doesn't automagically trigger checksum recalculation.
You don't understand the problem.
When a packet gets received, if the hardware checksums the packet
it sets skb->ip_summed. If you take that SKB and want to transmit
it you have to reinitialize the skb->ip_summed field or else things
explode.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-02 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <p05111b01bb728bc8972e@[10.96.96.13]>
2003-08-27 20:28 ` [Bridge] Re: [2.4.22] bad interaction between e100 and bridge: BUG at dev.c:991! Stephen Hemminger
2003-08-28 20:24 ` [Bridge] [more info] " Hannes Schulz
2003-08-31 2:01 ` [Bridge] " David S. Miller
2003-09-02 17:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-09-02 18:23 ` Bart De Schuymer
2003-09-02 18:17 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-09-05 18:30 ` [Bridge] [PATCH 2.4] bridging and hw checksum fix Stephen Hemminger
2003-09-03 14:56 ` [Bridge] Re: [2.4.22] bad interaction between e100 and bridge: BUG at dev.c:991! Hannes Schulz
2003-09-03 15:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2003-09-03 16:49 ` Bart De Schuymer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030902111729.1791f2ad.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=bdschuym@pandora.be \
--cc=bridge@osdl.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=schulz@schwaar.com \
--cc=scott.feldman@intel.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.