From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: longhaul: Unknown VIA CPU Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:00:39 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030903120038.GF1225@redhat.com> References: <3F55187F.70707@free.fr> <1062596994.574.1.camel@sven> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1062596994.574.1.camel@sven> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sven Dowideit Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 11:49:55PM +1000, Sven Dowideit wrote: > I sent DaveJones a patch that at least says that the Nehemiah is not > implemented, but i have not heard from him since.. sorry, I thought I replied.. > also, the email > address will need to be changed to the codemonkey one :) Already fixed in 2.6, not sure about the 2.4/2.4-ac backports. > However, VIA have not yet made that info available to the public (I'm > hoping Dave has a copy) I have the relevant documentation, and a Nehemiah that should support power scaling, however when I try to use it according to how the spec says I should I get nonsense returned from certain MSRs, and no speed change. I'm still waiting to hear back from Centaur. I pinged them again yesterday, hopefully I can get an answer on this pretty soon. Dave -- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk