From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Subject: Re: Which cpufreq driver is best for ...
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 01:27:57 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20030904232757.GA8665@brodo.de>
References: <20030903055749.GA21721@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20030903192749.GA30360@brodo.de> <3F5731DD.8050700@basmevissen.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F5731DD.8050700@basmevissen.nl>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Bas Mevissen <ml@basmevissen.nl>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:36:45PM +0200, Bas Mevissen wrote:
> Maybe this (together with your extensive explanation in this thread) can 
> be FAQ-ed. With a good explanation of the power saving models (clock 
> modulation, clock modification&voltage scaling, cpu idling) a lot of 
> questions can be answered.

Have you got some spare time? If so, a patch / file with such a FAQ /
summary would be greatly appreciated.

	Dominik