From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Hiroshi Miura <miura@da-cha.org>
Cc: Ducrot Bruno <ducrot@poupinou.org>,
"'cpufreq@www linux org uk'" <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [new] event mode on speedstep-smi.
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:56:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905065604.GD4003@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d6egyvfo.wl%miura@da-cha.org>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:40:11AM +0900, Hiroshi Miura wrote:
> At Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:30:13 +0200,
> Ducrot Bruno wrote:
> >
> > > perf_level: high 16bit is 0x07d0. this is 2000 in decimal.
> > > I think this means polling interval is 2000ms.
> > >
> > > This code is based on my original one.
> > > Ducrot, How about this?
> > >
> >
> > I don't understand the real use for. Does this permit
> > to switch from performance to powersave when plug in/out ac?
> > If yes, you can have the exact same behaviour via acpi and acpid,
> > with an interrupt driven approach instaead of just polling.
>
> Yes, now this only switch when plug in/out ac.
> I am also using acpi/acpid staff to switch it.
> My posted code is now only experimental.
>
> BTW, I want to understand Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology.
>
> I don't know whether 440MX based M-Pentium III-(M) supports
> EIST or not, but I have tried to switch to demand based switching mode.
>
> Someone said this is a point feature of EIST.
> At least, M-Pentium-III-(M) (Tullantin) is EIST ready.
>
> If SMI interface supported EIST, I think something 'polling' may be needed.
> My code is to try this. I am now looking for EIST function call on SMI.
I _think_ that within EIST the demand should be detected by the kernel
based on its load. If your assumption is right, though, such a governor
would be a great addition.
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-04 14:52 [new] event mode on speedstep-smi Hiroshi Miura
2003-09-04 15:30 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-09-04 23:40 ` Hiroshi Miura
2003-09-05 6:56 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2003-09-05 13:07 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-09-04 23:25 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-04 23:53 ` Hiroshi Miura
2003-09-05 6:54 ` speedstep-smi into -ac ? Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-05 8:46 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-09-07 18:55 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-08 8:32 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-09-08 9:23 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-08 12:30 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-09-05 14:51 ` [new] event mode on speedstep-smi Ducrot Bruno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030905065604.GD4003@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ducrot@poupinou.org \
--cc=miura@da-cha.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.