From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:33:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905093328.GA200@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0309031618390.944-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Hi!
> > Notice that this is done during resume. You are free to suspend with 1
> > cpu, then attempt to resume with 2 cpus. Not *too* likely to happen,
> > but....
>
> That's a silly thing to do, though I don't support the notion of letting
> people find out the hard way. Why not just fail on CONFIG_SMP until it's
> done right?
I guess runtime check for number of cpus is better idea -- with more
P4's around kernels with CONFING_SMP will be very common. We should at
least work in single-processor config there.
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-31 23:28 Fix up power managment in 2.6 Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 6:57 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 8:26 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-01 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 21:52 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:30 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Russell King
2003-09-02 17:17 ` Greg KH
2003-09-03 15:13 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 10:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 13:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 13:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 17:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 0:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 16:11 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 16:21 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 23:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 17:59 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-03 23:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 9:33 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-09-03 20:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-03 22:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 4:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-04 14:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 10:29 ` Jan Rychter
2003-09-05 5:58 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 10:56 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 11:51 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 17:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:57 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 19:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:09 ` Keyboard stuff (was Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6) Rob Landley
2003-09-05 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:01 ` Fix up power managment in 2.6 Richard A Nelson
2003-09-05 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:49 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-05 20:13 Nicolas Mailhot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030905093328.GA200@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.