From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Daum <peter_daum@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 22:39:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030907213924.GA28927@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73u17ojq83.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
>
> > With CONFIG_M686 CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT was set to 5, but a Pentium 4
> > requires 7.
> It doesn't require 7, it just prefers 7.
*nod*. This 'fix' also papers over the bug instead of fixing it.
Likely it's something like a network card driver setting its cacheline
size incorrectly. Peter what NIC did you see the problem on ?
I thought Ivan's PCI cacheline sizing fixes from 2.6
(see arch/i386/pci/common.c) already made it into 2.4,
but from a quick grep, it seems that didn't happen.
> > The patch below does:
> > - set CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 7 for all Intel processors (needed for
> > the Pentium 4)
> > - set CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT 6 for the K6 (needed for the Athlon)
> I think these changes should be only done with CONFIG_X86_GENERIC is set.
> Otherwise the people who want kernels really optimized for their CPUs
> won't get the full benefit. On UP it does not make that much difference,
> but on a SMP kernel having a bigger than needed cache size wastes a lot
> of memory.
ACK.
Dave
--
Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-07 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030907195557.GK14436@fs.tum.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-07 20:30 ` [2.4 patch] fix CONFIG_X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT Andi Kleen
2003-09-07 21:39 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-09-08 8:15 ` Peter Daum
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.30.0309072228110.9987-100000@swamp.bayern.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-07 21:57 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-07 20:36 Manfred Spraul
2003-09-08 14:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-08 17:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-08 17:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-08 19:45 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-09-09 14:49 ` Peter Daum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-07 19:55 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 20:59 ` Peter Daum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030907213924.GA28927@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com.br \
--cc=peter_daum@t-online.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.