From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11] helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 19wlYy-0001Dy-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:41:56 -0700 Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60]) by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19wlYw-0002wN-JT for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 09:41:54 -0700 Received: from 216-15-124-77.c3-0.smr-ubr3.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([216.15.124.77] helo=mizar.alcor.net) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 19wlYu-0005HR-00 for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:41:52 -0400 Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19wlYu-0002TI-00 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:41:52 -0400 From: Matt Zimmerman Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch Message-ID: <20030909164152.GB7799@alcor.net> References: <200309091310.h89DAt2J002539@ccure.karaya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309091310.h89DAt2J002539@ccure.karaya.com> Sender: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:41:52 -0400 To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:10:55AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > adam@doogie.org said: > > All these combinations had this problem. However, Host 2.4.21-1um, > > UML 2.4.20-6um and host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.20-6um ran fine. > > I've been playing with this quite a bit and I can't make it misbehave. So, > I need some clues as to what you're doing that I'm not. Likewise. Adam can actually reproduce this with the exact same UML binary that I'm using (the one from my user-mode-linux .deb), but I can't reproduce it at all. We're also both using Debian unstable (I think), so most other factors should be the same as well. My host kernel is Debian's 2.4.21 with skas3 and device-mapper. -- - mdz ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel