Re: [PATCH] oops_in_progress is unlikely()

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

> > Your guess is incorrect.
> >
> > > You are always going to take an extra jump in one execution
> > > path after the function, and you will take a conditional jump
> > > before the function call in the other execution path. So, you
> > > always have the "extra" jumps, no matter.
> >
> > That is not true.  The "likely" path has no taken jumps.
> >
> 
> Absolutely, positively, irrefutably wrong! Any logical operation
> with any real processor can only result in a jump upon condition. The
> path not taken will always require a jump around the code that
> handled the jump upon condition unless the code exists at
> the end of a procedure where a 'return' will suffice. Period.

No.

	jz	not_likely
	likely_code
go_back:
	more_likely_core
	retn	

not_likely:
	do_whatever_you_need
	jmp go_back
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]