From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Karlis Peisenieks Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] recent in_range fix uncovered another bug? Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:15:49 +0300 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030911071549.GA1045@mt.lv> References: <20030910110555.GA30240@mt.lv> <20030911061644.B23BC2C0A7@lists.samba.org> <20030911070956.GA950@mt.lv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Rusty Russell Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030911070956.GA950@mt.lv> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:09:56AM +0300, Karlis Peisenieks wrote: > This patch solves "lockup" problem, but what about tons of equal > conntracks? Sorry, I overlooked how confirm works, now it is clear that two equal conntracks can not be on lists. The only problem stays that potentially innocent packets (e.g. in case of icmp echo request) get dropped. Is it correct? Karlis