From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
richard.brunner@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Athlon/Opteron Prefetch Fix for 2.6.0test5 + numbers
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 07:26:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030917072650.78f10ebf.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F67E8D4.6010707@cyberone.com.au>
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:53:40 +1000
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote:
>
> The conditional compilation thing is a seperate issue. This patch may
> have just broken a few camels' backs.
>
> What is intriguing to me is the "Its only a 2% slowdown of the page
> fault for every cpu other than K[78] for this single workaround. There
Erm. It helps to get your numbers right first when arguing. Why did I waste the
time on benchmarking and collecting data when people afterwards still argue with
bogus numbers? @)
It is not 2%, but <1% [~0.6% to be exact]
(probably lower the statistical error for the test, LMBench results vary more
than that on multiple runs)
Then it is not for all page faults, but only for a very narrow special
case - a page fault that is not handled, but causes a signal. These are
not very common. Arguably there are some applications that use this
stuff (like generational garbage collectors), but these are not exactly
common.
In summary, it causes 0.6% slowdown in an quite obscure use case.
That's small enough that it is best to just always enable it, because
the cost of processing any support request when people forget to enable
etc. is much greater.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-17 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-17 2:22 [PATCH] Athlon/Opteron Prefetch Fix for 2.6.0test5 + numbers Andi Kleen
2003-09-17 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-17 3:25 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-17 4:53 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-17 5:08 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-17 5:19 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-17 7:15 ` Dave Hansen
2003-09-17 5:26 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2003-09-17 5:44 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-17 19:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-17 20:21 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-17 20:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-17 21:12 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-18 15:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-18 16:04 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-18 17:06 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-18 19:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-19 6:55 ` Kai Henningsen
2003-09-19 10:02 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030917072650.78f10ebf.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=richard.brunner@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.