From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldric (baldric.uwo.ca [129.100.10.225]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1E54856 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:51:13 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:49:06 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Jan-Benedict Glaw Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] update of libc? Message-ID: <20030918174906.GD30890@systemhalted> References: <20030918113157.000037fb.t.riemer@visoel.de> <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted> <20030918173133.GG12661@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030918173133.GG12661@lug-owl.de> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 07:31:33PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Thu, 2003-09-18 12:02:49 -0400, Carlos O'Donell > wrote in message <20030918160249.GC30890@systemhalted>: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Tilo Riemer wrote: > > > is it dangerous to make an update of libc from 2.2.5 to 2.3.x? > > > At the moment I have only remote access to the affected host. > > > > There is no 2.3.x glibc available for debian, it's currently being > > fixed. I apologize for the delay, it's more difficult than usual. > > No? Sorry, 2.3.2, my brain isn't responding to the usual shock treatment. c.