From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldric (baldric.uwo.ca [129.100.10.225]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83861483E for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:30:27 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:28:13 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: John David Anglin Cc: James Bottomley , dave.anglin@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] r19 (aka pic-register akak ltp) not restored on Message-ID: <20030919192813.GL18225@systemhalted> References: <1063996009.1832.34.camel@mulgrave> <200309191855.h8JItUaf003758@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200309191855.h8JItUaf003758@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 02:55:30PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 12:51, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > mutex_unlock becomes: > > > __libc_maybe_call (__pthread_mutex_unlock, (m), (*(int *)(m) = 0)) > > > > This seems all to work: > > Yah, the normal code that gcc generates to restore the ltp is very > extensively tested. Shared libraries would break almost instantly > if there were major problems. > If it were major we would have fixed it :) I'm trying to find the "missed a restore" point. c.