From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262201AbTJAOS3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:18:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262223AbTJAOS3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:18:29 -0400 Received: from lidskialf.net ([62.3.233.115]:31183 "EHLO beyond.lidskialf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262201AbTJAOSZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 10:18:25 -0400 From: Andrew de Quincey To: Sven =?iso-8859-1?q?K=F6hler?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ACPI] p2b-ds blacklisted? Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:16:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310011516.45878.adq@lidskialf.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 01 Oct 2003 3:07 pm, Sven Köhler wrote: > Hi, > > my P2B-DS is blacklisted and the kernel forced acpi=ht. i wonder why > because P2B-D is not blacklisted. > > There is no comment or any other hint for a reason in dmi_scan.c :-( > > I would like to try what happens if i remove the board from the > blacklist. What can i test to see if it works properly? And what is the > worse case of what could happen? > > Do i have to edit dmi_scan.c for my test or is there something like > acpi=force? I'm sure I saw a comment somewhere saying the P2B-S was blacklisted because of "bogus IRQ routing". It was in the blacklisting code, but I can't remember where, or if it was 2.4 or 2.6.