From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>,
User-mode Linux Kernel Development
<user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: pthreads?
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 16:42:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031002144237.GB5285@vagabond> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0310021605040.8567-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 16:28:45 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Jan Hudec wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 12:03:10 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Hence _your_ simple application doesn't need libpthread.
> >
> > Hence NEITHER OF GTK, GDK, GLIB, GMODULE, GOBJECT, PANGO, ATK, X11 NEED
> > libpthread!
> >
> > > | gcc -Wl,-T,arch/um/uml.lds.s -static -Wl,--wrap,malloc -Wl,--wrap,free -Wl, --wrap,calloc -o linux arch/um/main.o vmlinux -L/usr/lib -lutil -L/usr/X11R6/li b -lgtk -lgdk -lX11 -lXi -lXext -lglib -lgmodule -ldl -lm -lgthread
> >
> > However if you link with gthread, you need pthread.
> > So: a) Please don't blame it on X11.
>
> What about this:
>
> | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a(XlibInt.o)(.text+0x74c): In function `_XEventsQueued':
> | : undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
> | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a(XlibInt.o)(.text+0x766): In function `_XEventsQueued':
> | : undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
> | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a(XlibInt.o)(.text+0x781): In function `_XEventsQueued':
> | : undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
> | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a(XlibInt.o)(.text+0x79a): In function `_XEventsQueued':
> | : undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
> | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a(XlibInt.o)(.text+0x7b7): In function `_XEventsQueued':
> | : undefined reference to `pthread_equal'
> | /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.a(XlibInt.o)(.text+0xafc): more undefined references to `pthread_equal' follow
>
> Some investigation shows that libX11 needs pthread_equal() when linked
> statically, while it doesn't need it when linked dynamically.
Ugh. That sounds strange, that a library needs something only if linked
staticaly. However, it really looks like static libX11 causing trouble.
> > b) Don't link against gthread unless you need them.
> > b.1) If you only call Gtk stuff in one thread, you don't need them.
> > b.2) If you call Gtk stuff from more than one thread, you can still
> > provide gthread library with custom locking and get rid of
> > pthread.
>
> I tried that, providing my own implementation for pthread_equal().
> However, it hangs during gtk_init(). Since this doesn't happen within my
> stand-alone GTK test app, it must be some interaction between UML and GTK...
It would be interesting to know where it actualy hangs.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-02 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-11 15:54 [uml-devel] pthreads? Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-11 17:55 ` Jeff Dike
2003-09-12 8:52 ` [uml-devel] pthreads? Gerd Knorr
2003-09-12 9:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-12 11:08 ` Gerd Knorr
2003-09-12 11:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-12 12:15 ` Gerd Knorr
2003-09-12 12:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-12 11:18 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-09-12 16:28 ` Jeff Dike
2003-09-12 22:25 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-09-13 18:53 ` Jeff Dike
2003-09-13 21:01 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-09-13 15:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-13 18:54 ` Jeff Dike
2003-09-15 6:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-15 9:19 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-09-15 9:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-15 10:51 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-09-16 18:44 ` BlaisorBlade
2003-10-02 9:20 ` Jan Hudec
2003-10-02 9:08 ` Jan Hudec
2003-10-02 9:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-02 9:31 ` Jan Hudec
[not found] ` <Pine.GSO.4.21.0310021146500.8567-100000@vervain.sonytel.be>
2003-10-02 13:52 ` Jan Hudec
2003-10-02 14:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-02 14:42 ` Jan Hudec [this message]
2003-10-07 15:51 ` The Story Continues (was: Re: [uml-devel] Re: pthreads?) Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-11 1:48 ` Jeff Dike
2003-10-11 8:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-12 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-10-06 13:29 ` [uml-devel] Re: pthreads? BlaisorBlade
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-12 12:30 stian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031002144237.GB5285@vagabond \
--to=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.