From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263926AbTJEWUH (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 18:20:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263928AbTJEWUH (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 18:20:07 -0400 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:23709 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263926AbTJEWUC (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2003 18:20:02 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:19:57 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" To: Georg Chini Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SPARC64 and 32: Several problems with 2.6.0-test5 and test6 Message-Id: <20031005151957.531924b8.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3F808216.3090106@triaton-webhosting.com> References: <3F808216.3090106@triaton-webhosting.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 22:41:58 +0200 Georg Chini wrote: > I did some testing with test5 and test6 kernels on > my Sparc Ultra1 and Sparcstation 5. Here is a summary > of the problems I observed. Maybe this helps to fix > things. Your report is appreciated, but it's be more useful if you reported it to the sparc specific list instead of here.