From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Benedyczak <golbi@mat.uni.torun.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
pwaechtler@mac.com, Michal Wronski <wrona@mat.uni.torun.pl>
Subject: Re: POSIX message queues
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 19:16:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031005181630.GA26958@mail.shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F80484A.3030105@redhat.com>
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > In another words: is our implementation in the position
> > of NGPT or better? ;-)
>
> I don't understand. Why NGPT and what about "position"?
He is asking if the work will be wasted effort that is dismissed or
superceded, like NGPT was.
> If you mean
> including a solution in the runtime (librt), sure, this will happen.
> But not before I see a solution in the official kernel.
Speaking of librt - I should not have to link in pthreads and the
run-time overhead associated with it (locking stdio etc.) just so I
can use shm_open(). Any chance of fixing this?
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-05 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-05 9:13 POSIX message queues Krzysztof Benedyczak
2003-10-05 10:11 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-10-06 19:04 ` Krzysztof Benedyczak
2003-10-05 16:35 ` Ulrich Drepper
2003-10-05 18:16 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2003-10-05 18:32 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-10-05 19:18 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-05 21:52 ` Ulrich Drepper
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-02 9:51 POSIX Message Queues Ardhan Madras
2010-06-15 3:34 Ardhan Madras
2010-06-15 15:33 ` Glynn Clements
2010-06-12 9:10 Ardhan Madras
2010-06-12 13:40 ` Glynn Clements
2004-04-08 22:22 posix message queues Arnd Bergmann
2004-04-07 19:07 Andrew Morton
2004-04-07 19:15 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-04-08 8:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-04-08 8:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-08 14:08 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-04-08 20:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-09 23:45 ` David S. Miller
2004-04-10 11:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-04-10 11:53 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-04-10 20:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2003-10-07 7:50 POSIX " Peter Waechtler
2003-10-07 8:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2002-10-02 10:35 Krzysztof Benedyczak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031005181630.GA26958@mail.shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=golbi@mat.uni.torun.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=pwaechtler@mac.com \
--cc=wrona@mat.uni.torun.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.