From: Nate Lawson <nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031006144829.Y3803@root.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3DDA-sBd4vmA9Se58QrAoInS571DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
Since in ACPI 2.0 a processor declaration block can be under \_SB_, it
counts as a device. If you don't want this in ACPICA, I'll stick it under
our Processor driver.
-Nate
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Moore, Robert wrote:
> _INI methods are only called on objects of type "Device", as per the
> ACPI specification.
> Bob
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate-Y6VGUYTwhu0@public.gmane.org]
> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 9:47 AM
> To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> Cc: Moore, Robert
> Subject: \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization
>
> My laptop has two performance states I have been using, however, I get a
> 0
> when I read the mhz and mW associated with each state. When running
> with
> debug = ACPI_LV_INIT, I noticed that the processor's _INI method is not
> called and this is what fills out the Px info. Is this something you'll
> add to ACPICA or should I be handling that myself?
>
> http://root.org/~nate/acpi/ibm-acpidump.asl.gz
>
> -Nate
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-06 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-06 18:15 \_PR\CPU\_INI not called during initialization Moore, Robert
[not found] ` <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3DDA-sBd4vmA9Se58QrAoInS571DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-06 21:50 ` Nate Lawson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-06 22:58 Moore, Robert
2003-10-06 22:33 Moore, Robert
[not found] ` <D3A3AA459175A44CB5326F26DA7A189C1C3DE0-sBd4vmA9Se58QrAoInS571DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-10-06 22:55 ` Nate Lawson
2003-10-06 16:47 Nate Lawson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031006144829.Y3803@root.org \
--to=nate-y6vguytwhu0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.