From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262580AbTJIVF2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:05:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262581AbTJIVF2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:05:28 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:7091 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262580AbTJIVFZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:05:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 14:05:23 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Martin Aspeli Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Horrible ordeals with ACPI, APIC and HIGHMEM (2.6.0-test* and -ac kernels) Message-ID: <20031009140523.A18065@build.pdx.osdl.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from optilude@gmx.net on Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:50:10PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Martin Aspeli (optilude@gmx.net) wrote: > I've been trying the 2.6.0-test kernels, mostly for the speedstep support > (which appears to work). However, when I put ACPI in the kernel, all goes > wrong. Without ACPI, half my hardware is left IRQ-less. These are the > symptoms: Which 2.6.0-test kernels? Have you tried 2.6.0-test7? A fix for this type of problem went into -test7. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net