From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
To: LinuxPPC Developers <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Time precision, adjtime(x) vs. gettimeofday
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 23:53:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031010075302.GT2828@plato.local.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031010011254.078c84a8.billfink@mindspring.com>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:12:54AM -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
>
> This discussion prompted me to finally ask about another clock related
> problem I see on the 867 MHz G4 systems at work. The clocks on
> these systems continuously run 0.2% slow (about 3 minutes per day).
> Apparently this is more than ntp can adjust for (using scaling), as I
> get many of these error messages in the log:
is it a quicksilver G4? i maintain one of those and its time goes off
much faster then that (3 minutes within a couple hours).
the fix is rather simple:
--- linux.old/arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_time.c.orig Sat Nov 30 02:33:49 2002
+++ linux/arch/ppc/platforms/pmac_time.c Sat Nov 30 02:33:22 2002
@@ -262,7 +262,9 @@
* calibration. That's better since the VIA itself seems
* to be slightly off. --BenH
*/
+#if 0
if (!machine_is_compatible("MacRISC2"))
+#endif
if (via_calibrate_decr())
return;
in the case of the quicksilver VIA is FAR better then whatever it uses
instead.
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-10 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-10 5:12 Time precision, adjtime(x) vs. gettimeofday Bill Fink
2003-10-10 7:33 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-10-10 16:39 ` Bill Fink
2003-10-10 7:53 ` Ethan Benson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-11 4:45 Bill Fink
2003-10-11 5:27 ` Ethan Benson
2003-10-11 14:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-14 7:07 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-10-14 11:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-08 13:32 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-08 15:48 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-10-08 16:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-08 17:50 ` Gabriel Paubert
2003-10-08 18:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-10-08 22:17 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031010075302.GT2828@plato.local.lan \
--to=erbenson@alaska.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.