All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: G?bor L?n?rt <lgb@lgb.hu>,
	Stuart Longland <stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org>,
	Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>,
	Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.7 thoughts
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:21:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031010152120.GE727@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031010151231.GD28795@mail.shareable.org>

William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> You need at least enough warning to get out of critical sections (e.g.
>> holding a spinlock) and dump registers out to memory. i.e. as long as it
>> takes to schedule out whatever's currently running on the thing.
>> ... and unless you want to start enforcing realtime bounds, the answer
>> to "how long do you have to give the kernel to do it?" is "forever".
>> In practice, it won't take forever, but no finite time is enforcible.

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> You can create a very peculiar scheduling state to make even
> spinlocked sections multi-task, so the CPU can be released in a finite
> time and quickly - about as quickly as taking an NMI and broadcasting
> the critical IPIs to tell other CPUs to take over.
> The peculiar state is restored to normal as soon as the number
> of concurrent critical sections no longer exceeds the number of real CPUs.

DOH. Okay, that would do it.


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-10 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-09  8:08 2.7 thoughts Frederick, Fabian
2003-10-09  8:55 ` John Bradford
2003-10-09  9:45   ` mario noioso
2003-10-09 11:58 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-09 14:57   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10  6:19     ` Stuart Longland
2003-10-10  6:30       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10  7:30         ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10  7:40           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10  8:47             ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10  9:09               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:26                 ` YoshiyaETO
2003-10-10 10:50                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:55                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 10:51       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 14:07         ` Stuart Longland
2003-10-10 14:27           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-10-10 14:35           ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-10 14:47             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 14:48               ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-10 15:01                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 15:50                   ` Mark Mielke
2003-10-10 16:35                     ` Chris Friesen
2003-10-10 16:44                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-12 20:14                   ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-10 15:12               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-10-10 15:21                 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-10-10 18:03               ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-10 18:29                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-10-10 18:56                   ` Tim Hockin
2003-10-10 23:40                     ` Rusty Russell
2003-10-15 19:15           ` Anton Blanchard
2003-10-10 13:30       ` Kevin Corry
2003-10-10 18:29         ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-11  3:49           ` jw schultz
2003-10-11 13:24             ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-11 19:50               ` jw schultz
2003-10-10 17:12       ` Matt Simonsen
2003-10-10 20:59   ` Pedro Larroy
2003-10-09 18:17 ` Greg KH
2003-10-09 19:07 ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-09 11:56 Svetoslav Slavtchev
2003-10-09 12:44 Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-10-09 13:17 Frederick, Fabian
2003-10-09 13:19 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-09 13:50 ` Gábor Lénárt
2003-10-09 13:52 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-10-10 19:01 Zwane Mwaikambo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031010152120.GE727@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=lgb@lgb.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=stuartl@longlandclan.hopto.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.