From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixing the cases where tcp_tw_bucket was accessed as a sock
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:36:48 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031015113648.GD1174@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031013124930.0e75a325.davem@redhat.com>
Em Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:49:30PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:13:44 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
>
> > The WARN_ON is just to be paranoid for a while, I should have done
> > that a loooong time ago :-\
>
> I appreciate the intentions here but the resulting code is
> really a mess. We have this thing now in in.h called
> "inet_something()" that tests TCP state, and then we have
> something similar for ipv6 in addrconf.c :-)
>
> Let's do one thing at a time. First, fix the original bug
> in tcp_ipv4.c by just putting your inet_rcv_saddr() shorthand
> right there in tcp_ipv4.c and name it tcp4_rcv_saddr() or
> something like that.
>
> Then we can move onto the rest of the changes and try to find
> a common place for the helper routines.
>
> See what happens when you try to do too many things at one
> time :-)
:) Here is the first part:
===== net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c 1.69 vs edited =====
--- 1.69/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c Wed Oct 8 12:27:40 2003
+++ edited/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c Wed Oct 15 09:26:29 2003
@@ -178,9 +178,15 @@
tcp_sk(sk)->bind_hash = tb;
}
+static inline const u32 tcp_v4_rcv_saddr(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return likely(sk->sk_state != TCP_TIME_WAIT) ?
+ inet_sk(sk)->rcv_saddr : tcptw_sk(sk)->tw_rcv_saddr;
+}
+
static inline int tcp_bind_conflict(struct sock *sk, struct tcp_bind_bucket *tb)
{
- struct inet_opt *inet = inet_sk(sk);
+ const u32 sk_rcv_saddr = tcp_v4_rcv_saddr(sk);
struct sock *sk2;
struct hlist_node *node;
int reuse = sk->sk_reuse;
@@ -193,9 +199,9 @@
sk->sk_bound_dev_if == sk2->sk_bound_dev_if)) {
if (!reuse || !sk2->sk_reuse ||
sk2->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
- struct inet_opt *inet2 = inet_sk(sk2);
- if (!inet2->rcv_saddr || !inet->rcv_saddr ||
- inet2->rcv_saddr == inet->rcv_saddr)
+ const u32 sk2_rcv_saddr = tcp_v4_rcv_saddr(sk2);
+ if (!sk2_rcv_saddr || !sk_rcv_saddr ||
+ sk2_rcv_saddr == sk_rcv_saddr)
break;
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-15 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-12 13:13 [PATCH] fixing the cases where tcp_tw_bucket was accessed as a sock Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-13 19:49 ` David S. Miller
2003-10-15 11:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2003-10-16 5:10 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031015113648.GD1174@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.