From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261368AbTJRGgL (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:36:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261376AbTJRGgL (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:36:11 -0400 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:1286 "EHLO www.home.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261368AbTJRGgJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2003 02:36:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 08:35:59 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc reliability & performance Message-ID: <20031018063559.GD16761@alpha.home.local> References: <1066356438.15931.125.camel@cube> <20031017023437.GB28158@work.bitmover.com> <01e601c39484$f3fa31c0$890010ac@edumazet> <20031017021040.4964309a.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031017021040.4964309a.davem@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:10:40AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:01:53 +0200 > "dada1" wrote: > > > A "cat /proc/net/tcp" takes too much time to even try it. :( > > > > tools like "netstat" or "lsof", (even with -n flag) are just unusable. > > Because they don't use the netlink TCP socket dumping > facility which is made to handle such things much better > than procfs ever can. Hmmm very interesting. And is there an equivalent replacement for /proc/net/ip_conntrack ? And if not, what would be needed to implement it ? Willy