From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261895AbTJRXGf (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:06:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261901AbTJRXGf (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:06:35 -0400 Received: from line103-242.adsl.actcom.co.il ([192.117.103.242]:29312 "EHLO beyondmobile1.beyondsecurity.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261895AbTJRXGc (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:06:32 -0400 From: Aviram Jenik Organization: Beyond Security Ltd. To: Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: swsusp in test8 fails with intel-agp and i830 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 01:06:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310190106.14966.aviram@beyondsecurity.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 19 October 2003 00:18, John Mock wrote: > > With vesafb, you should be able to get any resultion you want at > 60Hz. Which is okay, because you have LCD. > > Not necessarily, at least not on a VAIO R505EL This is due to the well- > known (to some X hackers at least) 'stolen memory' problem. Indeed, the same with my R505DL. I imagine vesafb is not much of a workaround for most vaio R505 users :-( Pavel - I looked in intel_agp and placed printk+mdelay all over agp_intel_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev), but something strange happened: I saw those print outs during _suspend_ and not during resume - does that make any sense? -- Aviram Jenik Beyond Security Ltd. http://www.BeyondSecurity.com http://www.SecuriTeam.com Know that you're safe: http://www.AutomatedScanning.com