From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262240AbTJSVWI (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:22:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262241AbTJSVWI (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:22:08 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:59778 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262240AbTJSVWF (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:22:05 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:21:57 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Diego Calleja Garc?a Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: reproduceable oops in -test8 Message-ID: <20031019212157.GD1215@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Diego Calleja Garc?a , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031018234848.51a2b723.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> <20031019011949.GD711@holomorphy.com> <20031019165914.4360b3b7.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> <20031019191346.GB1108@holomorphy.com> <20031019230751.5434e3fb.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031019230751.5434e3fb.aradorlinux@yahoo.es> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org El Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:13:46 -0700 William Lee Irwin III escribi?: >> You say the behavior of vanilla 2.6.0-test8 was the machine and/or process >> getting hung? And this is still happening even after the fixes? On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:07:51PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote: > Yes. El Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:13:46 -0700 William Lee Irwin III escribi?: >> Thing is, it's working perfectly here, though I don't have a decent way >> to use totem. Could you send the results of sysrq t when it "hangs"? On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:07:51PM +0200, Diego Calleja Garc?a wrote: > Ok, I'll paste totem, esd, ps and xmms. xmms also hangs like totem; both of > them are trying to play through esd (which is blocked, too). This is > -test8-wli1 + fix. I suspect a deadlock on pcm->open_mutex; I'm doing some more reading around there to figure out what on earth is going on. -- wli