From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from baldric (baldric.uwo.ca [129.100.10.225]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DD5483E for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2003 15:55:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 17:51:30 -0400 From: Carlos O'Donell To: John David Anglin Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Message-ID: <20031019215130.GG8642@systemhalted> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [parisc-linux] HPPA FPU Specification? (FE_INEXACT raised by accident) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: jda, I've noticed that I cannot generate an underflow or overflow exception without also forcing an inexact exception on my PA 2.0 system. Are you familiar with this behaviour at all? I'm trying to straighten our fenv setup, and this is really the last crinkle. Raising an overflow is done with "DBL_MAX + DBL_MAX", while the underflow is "DBL_MIN/3.0". Both raise FE_INEXACT aswell. Cheers, Carlos.