From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263159AbTJUQNu (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:13:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263162AbTJUQNu
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:13:50 -0400
Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com ([216.239.45.4]:2258 "EHLO
	216-239-45-4.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263159AbTJUQNt (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Oct 2003 12:13:49 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:13:47 -0700
From: Frank Cusack <fcusack@fcusack.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: cset #'s stable?
Message-ID: <20031021091347.A7526@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Are changeset #'s stable?

I'm specifically looking at linux-2.5/net/sunrpc/clnt.c,
"rev 1.1153.63.[123]" which I recorded earlier as 1.1153.48.[123].

/fc