From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Bilien Subject: Re: start_threshold having no effect Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:28:57 +0200 Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: <20031021122857.GA30898@via.ecp.fr> References: <20031020173030.GC28408@via.ecp.fr> <200310202223.h9KMNQlC022039@oud.linuxaudiosystems.com> <20031021095054.GB30326@via.ecp.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Tue, Oct 21, 2003, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > For a voice IP applications, it probably make sense to work without over > and underrun detection (yes, if CPU is busy, there will be some scratches, > but you'll avoid resyncing). Simply set stop_threshold to boundary for > the no-xrun detection. Thanks a lot, I did this and was then able to run the application with delays of about 10 ms. -- Jobi ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100 http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54