From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263078AbTJUMQv (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:16:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263085AbTJUMQv (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:16:51 -0400 Received: from [212.239.225.50] ([212.239.225.50]:12416 "EHLO precious.kicks-ass.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263078AbTJUMQu convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2003 08:16:50 -0400 From: Jan De Luyck To: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns?= =?iso-8859-1?q?=20Rullg=E5rd?=), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test8] Difference between Software Suspend and Suspend-to-disk? Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:16:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200310211315.58585.lkml@kcore.org> <20031021113444.GC9887@louise.pinerecords.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310211416.45202.lkml@kcore.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 21 October 2003 13:40, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Tomas Szepe writes: > >> Software Suspend (EXPERIMENTAL) > >> Suspend-to-Disk Support > > > > They're competing implementations of the same mechanism. > > And neither one works reliably, I might add. They both appear to save > the current state to disk, but no matter what I try, I can't make it > resume properly. Well, I could suspend/resume correctly first time I tried (runlevel 2 and disabling nearly everything to minimize loss of data on crash). The second test in X resulted in a 'double fault'... Jan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/lSOrUQQOfidJUwQRAsV8AJ0WGVwtPCvoRU+nYzp+1rEPGjHrDwCffiZz wEG77k6o4VjLOb3dMvyLopg= =uta/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----