From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Dynamic frequency governor
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 21:31:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031021203122.GC871@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CFF522B18982EA4481D3A3E23B83141C24B4B6@orsmsx407.jf.intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:08:17AM -0700, Moore, Robert wrote:
> Can you be more specific about who has patents on what?
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,298,448.WKU.&OS=PN/6,298,448&RS=PN/6,298,448
Is a good place to start. Skimming through the references there brings
up further patents by just about everyone under the sun, including
Intel.
It looks a little murky in my not-professional-legal-person POV.
If Intel are looking at funding this work, it would be fantastic
to have their legal folks clear things up to be sure that this is
safe ground.
Dave
--
Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-20 17:08 Dynamic frequency governor Moore, Robert
2003-10-21 20:31 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-10-21 22:21 ` David Kar-Fai Tam
2003-10-21 23:19 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-20 16:33 Moore, Robert
2003-10-20 17:00 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-20 17:12 ` Daniel Thor Kristjansson
2003-10-20 17:25 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-10-20 17:32 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-20 17:35 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-10-20 18:10 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-20 23:28 ` Sven Dowideit
2003-10-20 15:31 Moore, Robert
2003-10-20 15:39 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-17 21:14 Moore, Robert
2003-10-18 5:00 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-10-18 5:58 ` Vivek Haldar
2003-10-19 21:34 ` Jeroen van der Vegt
2003-10-18 6:44 ` David Kar-Fai Tam
2003-12-22 21:41 ` David Kar-Fai Tam
2004-02-14 17:09 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-10-19 13:24 ` Dave Jones
2003-10-20 15:40 ` Daniel Thor Kristjansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031021203122.GC871@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.