From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Dynamic frequency governor Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 00:19:54 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20031021231953.GB1528@redhat.com> References: <20031021203122.GC871@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Kar-Fai Tam Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:21:37PM -0400, David Kar-Fai Tam wrote: > I did a quick text search on the website of the above address and I > couldn't find "voltage" mentioned anywhere. That is, I couldn't find any > mention of dynamic "voltage" scaling as a technique for saving power. > They only talk about is using the technique of "frequency" scaling to > save power. > > With DVS algorithms, we are attempting to dynamically change the voltage > to save power. The fact that the frequency varies is just a side effect. Not all implementations can scale voltage. Dave -- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk