From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Bokovoy Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] 0/3 Dynamic cpufreq governor and updates to ACPI P-state driver Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:24:01 +0300 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20031023082401.GE3847@sam-solutions.net> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB6007793C@scsmsx403.sc.intel.com> <1066897184.395.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1066897184.395.1.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-acpilinux-acpi@intel.com, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:19:44AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:21, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > > And with the kind of power savings that comes with these frequency > > changes, this behaviour > > results in longer battery life. However, as yet I do not have any > > numbers to quantify this gain, > > mainly because I do not have any setup where I can measure actual power. > > > > some time ago I did this by using the ACPI method of asking the battery > what the current use is at this point in time; it's of course not as > exact as a full measurement setup but it's a nice poor mans power watch > too .... Unfortunately, there is a number of ACPI-enabled BIOSes which report wrong battery rate when EST is in action -- they still continue to report a rate which corresponds to highest CPU frequency despite the fact that actual frequency might be the lowest one. -- / Alexander Bokovoy Samba Team http://www.samba.org/ ALT Linux Team http://www.altlinux.org/ Midgard Project Ry http://www.midgard-project.org/