From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
Subject: (reiser4 name) Re: Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4?
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:33:00 -0800
Message-ID: <20031028073300.GQ8540@pegasys.ws>
References: <20031028024209.GO8540@pegasys.ws> <3F9E1ABD.1050004@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-15915-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3F9E1ABD.1050004@namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@Namesys.COM>

On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:01AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> You mount it as reiser4, which is why in writing documentation I get 
> torn between calling it ReiserFS V4 and Reiser4.

Whether the length was intentional or not, thanks.
Sorry about the subject line, sloppiness on my part.

-- 
________________________________________________________________
	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw@pegasys.ws

		Remember Cernan and Schmitt