From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: iptables+2.6-test8-bk4 : Still problems Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:34:48 -0800 Sender: sparclinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031029103448.7255b095.davem@redhat.com> References: <3F9B8A5D.9010803@triaton-webhosting.com> <200310261052.25944.rezso@rdsor.ro> <20031026223438.1cf757ce.davem@redhat.com> <3F9ED206.4040806@triaton-webhosting.com> <20031028231317.7840e47f.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: georg.chini@triaton-webhosting.com, rezso@rdsor.ro, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Ryan Veety In-Reply-To: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:20:30 -0500 (EST) Ryan Veety wrote: > # iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p icmp -m limit --limit 10/second -j ACCEPT > iptables: Invalid argument > > No biggie for me, just happened to notice it. I suspect it's the "unsigned long" in "struct ipt_rateinfo", we'd need to translate these structures going in/out of netfilter :-( There are a bunch of other iptables target modules that would need similar translations.