From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Fedyk Subject: Re: Furure of ReiserfsV3? Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:07:37 -0800 Message-ID: <20031102190737.GD3907@matchmail.com> References: <3F9FC877.9000903@gmx.net> <1067436839.1632.253.camel@tiny.suse.com> <3F9FCF40.8060807@gmx.net> <.192.168.0.99.1067382465.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org> <3F9FE068.5060303@osiris.at> <.202.66.40.14.1067446837.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org> <3FA10515.4080403@gmx.net> <.147.8.44.10.1067511800.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <.147.8.44.10.1067511800.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thomas Graham Cc: Christian Mayrhuber , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 07:03:20PM +0800, Thomas Graham wrote: > Very interesting for your suggestion, does anyone got a benchmark to > compare XFS with reiserfs3 for large amount data process ? ( I am talking > about 20-30GB data pulling at once ) Thanks XFS Will most likely win that benchmark.