From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH] > 256 CPU cpumask build fix - const confusion
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:57:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031104195728.040db07a.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
Please apply the following patch. It's needed to build NR_CPUS > 256.
Without this fix, you get compile errors:
include/linux/cpumask.h: In function `next_online_cpu':
include/linux/cpumask.h:56: structure has no member named `val'
# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
# ChangeSet 1.1357 -> 1.1358
# include/linux/cpumask.h 1.1 -> 1.2
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/11/04 pj@sgi.com 1.1358
# Fix cpumask const confusion if NR_CPUS > 128 (i386) or > 256 (ia64).
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h Tue Nov 4 19:31:30 2003
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h Tue Nov 4 19:31:30 2003
@@ -53,18 +53,18 @@
static inline int next_online_cpu(int cpu, cpumask_t map)
{
do
- cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, map);
+ cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu, mk_cpumask_const(map));
while (cpu < NR_CPUS && !cpu_online(cpu));
return cpu;
}
#define for_each_cpu(cpu, map) \
- for (cpu = first_cpu_const(map); \
+ for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mk_cpumask_const(map)); \
cpu < NR_CPUS; \
- cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu,map))
+ cpu = next_cpu_const(cpu,mk_cpumask_const(map)))
#define for_each_online_cpu(cpu, map) \
- for (cpu = first_cpu_const(map); \
+ for (cpu = first_cpu_const(mk_cpumask_const(map)); \
cpu < NR_CPUS; \
cpu = next_online_cpu(cpu,map))
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-05 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-05 3:57 Paul Jackson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-16 20:52 [PATCH] > 256 CPU cpumask build fix - const confusion Paul Jackson
2003-12-16 21:55 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031104195728.040db07a.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.