From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bennett Todd Subject: Re: some basic questions Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:08:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20031105160801.GD548@rahul.net> References: <1067880381.17873.9.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> <1068044839.32072.0.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> <3FA91326.2060407@gmx.net> <1068047082.32079.2.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> <16297.7138.770007.332337@laputa.namesys.com> <1068047560.32072.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1068047560.32072.6.camel@redeeman.linux.dk> List-Id: To: Redeeman Cc: ReiserFS List --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline 2003-11-05T10:52:40 Redeeman: > will reiser4 be the most secure filesystem if the power dies, > because i live in denmark, and not in the city, so the power dies > quite often, and i want my data to be secure :) Once Reiser4 is stable and mature, it should be on the short list of the very best filesystems in this regard. However, if you want something today, I recommend ext3. Reiserfs4 should, we hope, eat its lunch eventually. But ext3 performs quite well, for the sort of simple stuff you want to do it should be fine (and vastly better than vfat). And ext3 right now has pretty mature and stable journaling, that in my experience leaves it effectively crashproof. Or at least highly crash-resistent. -Bennett --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/qSBhHZWg9mCTffwRAnWnAKCMGHneOSKtJm0vSTHIfu6HVQrzEQCfSIvG hD2fjlgjCNQbFNzgI0Ku1G8= =Pwyb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0IvGJv3f9h+YhkrH--