Re: [PATCH] Fix find busiest queue 2.6.0-test9

[Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>]

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 03:05, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> > I think the confusing bit is this:
> >
> > this_rq->prev_cpu_load[i] = rq_src->nr_running;
> >
> > where "this_rq->prev_cpu_load[i]" doesn't intuitively look like what it
> > means ;-) Even just 's/i/cpu/' would help a bit, or something (like
> > wrapping it in macros). Seems it is correct as was though - thanks for
> > explaining it.
>
> Maybe something like:
>
>  * We fend off statistical fluctuations in runqueue lengths by
>  * saving the runqueue length (as seen by the balancing CPU) during the
>  * previous load-balancing operation and using the smaller one the current

"during the previous load-balancing operation" is what made me interpret it 
differently.

Con