Re: [PATCH][DOCUMENTATION BUGFIX] latency in micro-, not nanoseconds

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:01:34PM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote:
 > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:45:02PM +0000, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:54:17PM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
 > >  > BTW, it's not enough for powernow-k7 to divide the BIOS-known latency by 50.
 > >  > This latency for one VID and one FID transition needs to be multiplied by
 > >  > the number of p-states minus 1, as that's the actual maximum latency due to
 > >  > the "one step up/down only" loop, IIRC.
 > > 
 > > Yoinks, I thought I had merged that patch (so did you judging from
 > > that last sentence), but it fell through the cracks somehow.
 > > I'll see if I can dig it out if I still have it.
 > > 
 > > 		Dave
 > > 
 > 
 > I expected that correcting latency and fixing the change_[FV]ID()
 > will make any patch doing 'one step up/down only' for K7 to be rejected?

Worse yet, I can't put my finger on the mail that had the patch.
I'll dig some more, but I'm wondering if this was lost in the
window between a backup and my IBM deskstars dieing a few months back.

Might have to hack something up from scratch after all..

		Dave