From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Zarochentsev Subject: Re: tail policy question Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:27:17 +0300 Message-ID: <20031114172716.GU1278@backtop.namesys.com> References: <3FB22E06.9070500@namesys.com> <20031114170604.GQ1278@backtop.namesys.com> <3FB46424.4000300@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FB46424.4000300@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Zhihui Zhang , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, vs@namesys.com On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 09:12:04PM -0800, Hans Reiser wrote: > Alex Zarochentsev wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 01:34:07PM -0500, Zhihui Zhang wrote: > > > > > >>Thanks for your and Alex's reply. I poke around a little bit more and > >>find out that the mkfs.c does use ITEM_TAIL40_ID, which happens to have > >>the same value as TAIL_ID (0x6) in the kernel file. > >> > >> > > > >they are from different name spaces. > > > > > > > > > > >>However, I am confused > >>when I see the following in plugin.h: > >> > >>PLUGIN_BY_ID(item_plugin, REISER4_ITEM_PLUGIN_TYPE, item); > >>PLUGIN_BY_ID(tail_plugin, REISER4_TAIL_PLUGIN_TYPE, tail); > >> > >> > > > >IFAIK above defines service functions for plugins of different types, > >it does not define concrete plugins. tail_plugin_type should be named > >as tail_policy_plugin for better understanding. > > > > > > > >>The item plugin has TAIL_ID if the item is of tail type. So what is the > >>use of a separate tail_plugin? Plus, the tail_plugin has three IDs > >>defined: NEVER, ALWAYS, and DEFAULT, none of which has a value of 0x6. My > >>guess is that the item plugin for tails are used to manage tails (merge, > >>split, read, write?), > >> > >> > > > >yes > > > > > > > >>while the tail_plugin is used to decide if a > >>conversion between tail format and extent format is needed. If so, the > >>reiser4.h file should have: > >> > >>#define REISER4_TAIL_PLUGIN (DEFAULT_TAIL_ID) > >> > >>instead of > >> > >>#define REISER4_TAIL_PLUGIN (ALWAYS_TAIL_ID) > >> > >>Does this make sense? Please clarify this for me. Thanks. > >> > >> > > > >what i would like to see: > >rename *_TAIL_ID to *_TAIL_POLICY_ID > >DEFAULT_TAIL_POLICY__ID renamed to SMART_TAIL_POLICY_ID > > > > > 16K_TAIL_POLICY is more informative.... I think digits cannot be at the first place. > > >#define REISER4_TAIL_POLICY_PLUGIN (one of SMART_TAIL_POLICY_ID > >ALWAYS_TAIL_POLICY_ID, > >NEVER_TAIL_POLICY_ID) > > > >Does it make things more clear? > > > >Thanks. > > > > > > > -- > Hans > > -- Alex.