From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:26 +0000 Subject: I2C patch for Linux 2.4.23-rc1 [Was: i2c oops] Message-Id: <20031126192943.7c464d8c.khali@linux-fr.org> List-Id: References: <20031115212538.677d0fd2.khali@linux-fr.org> In-Reply-To: <20031115212538.677d0fd2.khali@linux-fr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org > > I would really appreciate if you could take some time to test my > > patch and make sure it's working OK for you. > > I haven't had time to try the patch in the last week. Also, I just > recently tried 2.6.0-test10, and the sensors work beautifully with it. > It uses a new sysfs that I was unfamiliar with. Anyway, GKrellM seems > to be able to read the sensor data from /sys just fine. Thus, I guess > I will not be using 2.4 kernel again since my system seems to be > running better with the 2.6 kernel. We are also in the process or porting all our userspace tools to 2.6/sysfs, but it's not finished yet. > That said, thanks for all the work in patching the 2.4 kernel, and > keep up the good work toward the 2.6 kernel. Thanks :) We'll do our best. -- Jean Delvare http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/