From: Herve Eychenne <rv@wallfire.org>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@marasystems.com>
Cc: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: hashsize available through /proc was RAM and conntrack performance: first draft of the document is online
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:38:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031127113815.GD1083@eychenne.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311271102000.21649-100000@filer.marasystems.com>
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:09:03AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Herve Eychenne wrote:
Anyway, Harald had already made a patch for pom without telling,
and Patrick discussed it some hours ago.
> Also what kernel version did you do this in? Your source does not seem to
> match either 2.4.22 or 2.6.0-test10.. in the sources I see the conntrack
> sysctls are all in ip_conntrack_standalone.c not ip_conntrack_core.c..
> (looks like you got the filename wrong only.. the sources seem to match
> ip_conntrack_standalone.c even if the header say
> ip_conntrack_core.c.new/orig)
I worked on 2.4.22 Debian kernel sources (patched), but in vanilla
kernel 2.4.22, the files you're talking about are identical to the
Debian sources (which contain only a few patches).
And I maintain that my patch is against ip_conntrack_core.c...
This is crazy, as I'm aware that Harald's patch what against
ip_conntrack_standalone.c... but I just downloaded a fresh 2.4.22
kernel from kernel.org, and I can swear that sysctls are in
ip_conntrack_core.c (and not ip_conntrack_standalone.c).
rv@comet:/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/net/ipv4/netfilter$ grep sysctl *
ip_conntrack_core.c:#include <linux/sysctl.h>
ip_conntrack_core.c:static struct ctl_table_header *ip_conntrack_sysctl_header;
ip_conntrack_core.c:unregister_sysctl_table(ip_conntrack_sysctl_header);
ip_conntrack_core.c: ip_conntrack_sysctl_header
ip_conntrack_core.c: = register_sysctl_table(ip_conntrack_root_table, 0);
ip_conntrack_core.c: if (ip_conntrack_sysctl_header == NULL) {
ip_queue.c:#include <linux/sysctl.h>
ip_queue.c:static int sysctl_maxlen = IPQ_QMAX_DEFAULT;
ip_queue.c:static struct ctl_table_header *ipq_sysctl_header;
ip_queue.c: { NET_IPQ_QMAX, NET_IPQ_QMAX_NAME, &sysctl_maxlen,
ip_queue.c: sizeof(sysctl_maxlen), 0644, NULL, proc_dointvec },
ip_queue.c: ipq_sysctl_header = register_sysctl_table(ipq_root_table, 0);
ip_queue.c: goto cleanup_sysctl;
ip_queue.c:cleanup_sysctl:
ip_queue.c: unregister_sysctl_table(ipq_sysctl_header);
ipt_REJECT.c: /* FIXME: Use sysctl number. --RR */
ipt_ULOG.c: * nlgroup now global (sysctl)
rv@comet:/usr/src/linux-2.4.22/net/ipv4/netfilter$
Has someone an explanation, before I'm going nuts?
Herve
--
_
(°= Hervé Eychenne
//)
v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-27 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-28 15:10 RAM and conntrack performance Herve Eychenne
2003-11-03 8:12 ` Harald Welte
2003-11-25 15:35 ` Herve Eychenne
2003-11-25 20:57 ` Harald Welte
2003-11-26 3:42 ` RAM and conntrack performance: first draft of the document is online Herve Eychenne
2003-11-26 4:13 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-27 4:56 ` Herve Eychenne
2003-11-28 11:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-11-26 11:36 ` Harald Welte
2003-11-26 16:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2003-11-27 11:10 ` Harald Welte
2003-11-27 3:33 ` Herve Eychenne
2003-11-27 9:56 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-30 22:25 ` Harald Welte
2003-11-27 4:14 ` [PATCH] Re: hashsize available through /proc was " Herve Eychenne
2003-11-27 10:09 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-27 10:13 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-27 11:38 ` Herve Eychenne [this message]
2003-11-27 11:57 ` Henrik Nordstrom
2003-11-27 11:14 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031127113815.GD1083@eychenne.org \
--to=rv@wallfire.org \
--cc=hno@marasystems.com \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.