From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261872AbTLAH6e (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:58:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262052AbTLAH6e (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:58:34 -0500 Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([131.155.3.6]:4626 "EHLO kweetal.tue.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261872AbTLAH6d (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:58:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:58:24 +0100 From: Andries Brouwer To: William Lee Irwin III , James W McMechan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops with tmpfs on both 2.4.22 & 2.6.0-test11 Message-ID: <20031201075824.GA6068@win.tue.nl> References: <20031130.131750.-1591395.3.mcmechanjw@juno.com> <20031201012126.GN8039@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031201012126.GN8039@holomorphy.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 05:21:26PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:17:46PM -0800, James W McMechan wrote: > > Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00200200 > > c018a152 > > *pde = 00000000 > > Oops: 0002 [#1] > > CPU: 0 > > EIP: 0060:[] Not tainted > > This is significantly different in nature from the 2.4 oops, since > 2.4 hit NULL and this pointer is total garbage. > > Either it's a double bitflip or even worse is afoot. This oops is completely understood. I was going to write to you yesterday evening, but then saw that Oleg Drokin already had written. Didnt you see his mail?