From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Higdon Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] QLogic qla2xxx driver update available (v8.00.00b6). Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:50:55 -0800 Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20031202095055.GB173962@sgi.com> References: <20031202032253.GA175030@sgi.com> <20031202101506.GB31682@praka.local.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mtvcafw.SGI.COM ([192.48.171.6]:13737 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261775AbTLBJwp (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 04:52:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202101506.GB31682@praka.local.home> List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Vasquez , Andrew Vasquez , Jes Sorensen , Linux-SCSI , jbarnes@sgi.com, mdr@sgi.com On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 02:15:06AM -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > > Yes, in the Linux world, the NVRAM value is irrelevent -- the driver > will determine the ideal value based on the sizeof(dma_addr_t). I've > already removed the NVRAM reads of the host_p[] from > qla2x00_nvram_config(). Okay, that sounds good. Do I take this to mean that this whole block: ha->flags.disable_luns = ((nv->host_p[0] & BIT_2) ? 1 : 0); ha->flags.disable_risc_code_load = ((nv->host_p[0] & BIT_4) ? 1 : 0); ha->flags.set_cache_line_size_1 = ((nv->host_p[0] & BIT_5) ? 1 : 0); /* * enable_64bit_addressing gets set in qla2x00_config_dma_addressing; * do not set it here. * ha->flags.enable_64bit_addressing = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_0) ? 1 : 0); */ ha->flags.enable_lip_reset = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_1) ? 1 : 0); ha->flags.enable_lip_full_login = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_2) ? 1 : 0); ha->flags.enable_target_reset = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_3) ? 1 : 0); ha->flags.enable_flash_db_update = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_4) ? 1 : 0); will be gone in the next update? When do you plan to make the next update available? thanks, jeremy